Evaluation Comments

The Evaluation Comment newsletter provides in-depth detail about specific CRESST research topics.

1986

Reform by Raising Test Standards
Gene V. Glass and Mary Catherine Ellwein
From the Local Level - A Response to "Reform By Raising Test Standards"
Walter Hathaway
From the State Level - Comments on "Reform by Raising Test Standards"
Paul D. Sandifer

Educational Evaluation: Emergent Needs for Research
Eva L. Baker and Joan L. Herman

Whither Educational Evaluation: Life, Death, or Reincarnation
Susan Klein, Eva Baker, Carl Sewell, John Evans, Daniel Stufflebeam, Eleanor Chelimsky, and Shirley Jackson
Educational Evaluation - Indicators of Life, Death, or Reincarnation
Susan S. Klein
Is There a Perceived or Real Metamorphosis of Purpose for Educational Evaluation?
Eva L. Baker
What Is the Prognosis for Survival of Educational Evaluation at the Local School District Level?
Carl Sewell
Is Educational Evaluation Dying?
John W. Evans
Has the Profession of Educational Evaluation Changed with Changing Times?
Daniel L. Stufflebeam
An Analysis of Five Views of Evaluation
Eleanor Chellmsky
Educational Evaluation Will Be Reincarnated at the State and Local Levels
Shirley A. Jackson

Assessing Students: Teachers' Routine Practices and Reasoning
Donald W. Dorr-Bremme

School Accountability Laws
Robert E. Stake
On Rereading Stake
Gene V. Glass
Teacher Strike Feared If Bill Passes
Stephen Klein
The Criteria for Accountability: Pupil or Professional Performance
Frederick J. McDonald
Opening Accountability: A Story in Two Parts
Eva L. Baker

Scientific Method and the Adversary Model: Some Preliminary Suggestions
Murray Levine
An Adversary Model for Educational Evaluation
Marilyn Kourilsky
The Levine Adversary Model: An Adversary Comment
Marilyn Kourilsky
The Kourilsky Adversary Model: An Adversary Comment
Murray Levine

<< first < prev 123 next > last >>